Chief justice denies ex-Trump aide, UC Irvine professor Peter Navarro’s bid to delay sentence

By Lindsay Whitehurst

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON  — The Supreme Court on Monday refused to halt a prison sentence for former Trump White House official and UC Irvine professor Peter Navarro as he appeals his contempt of Congress conviction.

Navarro is due to report Tuesday, March 19 to a federal prison for a four-month sentence, after being found guilty of misdemeanor charges for refusing to cooperate with a congressional investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. He had asked to stay free while he appealed his conviction.

Navarro has maintained that he couldn’t cooperate with the committee because former President Donald Trump had invoked executive privilege. Lower courts have rejected that argument, finding he couldn’t prove Trump had actually invoked it.

The Monday order signed by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who handles emergency applications from Washington, D.C., said he has “no basis to disagree” with the appeals court ruling, though he said the finding doesn’t affect the eventual outcome of Navarro’s appeal.

His attorney Stanley Woodward declined to comment.

Navarro was a professor of economics in UC Irvine’s Paul Merage School of Business when he was tabbed by Trump in December 2016 to head the National Trade Council. Navarro is listed as a professor emeritus on the school’s website.

Navarro, who served as a White House trade adviser, was the second Trump aide convicted of misdemeanor contempt of Congress charges. Former White House adviser Steve Bannon previously received a four-month sentence but was allowed to stay free pending appeal by U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, who was appointed by Trump.

Navarro was found guilty of defying a subpoena for documents and a deposition from the House Jan. 6 committee. U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, refused his push to stave off his prison sentence and the federal appeals court in Washington agreed.

The Supreme Court is also separately preparing to hear arguments on whether Trump himself has presidential immunity from charges alleging he interfered in the 2020 election.

Source: Orange County Register